Picasa versus Windows Gallery

The possibly-too-quick-for-it’s-own-good rise of Google has set them up squarely as the new arch rival to Microsoft, and their latest advertising angle suggests more than a mild concern over the pre-installed applications in Microsoft’s looming Windows Vista, which is now in Beta testing.

Google have good reason to be concerned, because something Microsoft are already keen to promote is how Vista will help to “manage digital memories”, which to the layman means “show Photos and Videos”. To this end Microsoft look set to include “Windows Photo Gallery” when you buy the operating system.

Google have a photo management system called Picasa, and it’s now possible for Google advertisers to earn revenue by referring potential Picasa users to Google.

Previously Google only paid for two kinds of referrals: (1) to their advertising services and (2) to their own version of the Mozilla Firefox Browser, so the introduction of Picasa to this small group could be interpreted as a move to grab as much of the “digital memories” market as possible before Microsoft can use their monopoly to swamp the market.

Déjà Vu

Folks who’ve been around computers for a while will see strong parallels with the denouement of the “browser wars” of the the late 1990′s.

The main worry that Microsoft had about Netscape was that the Netscape web browser provided a means for thin client computing to become popular again. Thin clients had been common during the mainframe era, when the client was a simple box that did data input and output, with little or no processing. As the Personal Computer took hold, the processing moved from the mainframe to the client, and Microsoft made it’s money by selling an operating system for every client.

Microsoft feared Netscape because their browser re-introduced the concept of the thin client, and to mitigate the risk, Microsoft wanted to control the browser market. To this end they (unlawfully) gave away Internet Explorer freely with the Windows operating system in an attempt to “cut Netscape’s air supply” [Maritz]. The US Department of Justice ruled that “Microsoft’s dominance of the personal computer operating systems market constituted a monopoly, and that Microsoft had taken actions to crush threats to the monopoly.”

Changing the game

That was 10 years ago. Today Microsoft see Google in a similar vein because they are starting to deliver on the potential that Netscape opened everybody’s eyes to. Google’s web based applications make the operating system irrelevant, so they destroy the foundation of the Microsoft monopoly.

That’s the potential, but it can’t happen without there first being a free, open source alternative operating system for people to use instead, which is why Google’s recent push into the Linux market, and this most recent of advertising twists is an ominous foreshadowing of the corporate battle ahead.

About these ads

4 thoughts on “Picasa versus Windows Gallery”

  1. I find that with Vista Home Premium I can not use Picasa2 anymore due to a pop-up complaining that the application requires a screen resolution of at least 600X800 and vista has reduced the screen resolution, apparently to prevent usage of Picasa, (which is a much better program than the vista one!)

  2. You must have some issue with your graphics card because if you have a resolution below 600×800 (or 800×600 which I think is more likely) then you’re really having a pretty bad windows experience. Picasa works perfectly fine on my Home Premium though I’m kind of torn between whether Photo Gallery is better or Picasa is better.

  3. I’ve used both, and I think for editing purposes only, Windows Gallery wins hands-down. It gives you much more freedom, while Google limits you to quick fixes and minor tuning.
    When it comes to extra features though, and the all around package, there is no doubt that Picasa takes the prize.

    But, I sometimes get tired of all those features. I personally prefer Windows Gallery. Don’t get me wrong though, I generally don’t like Microsoft products (I’m using Vista, but only because pricing does not permit me to get a Macbook and I am so inept at *certain* computer tasks that I fear downloading Linux will render my PC useless)

  4. I have a Mac and use iPhoto and Google’s Picasa which has recently (finally!) been ported to Apple Mac OS X and both programs are great for viewing and editing digital memories (although iPhoto is no pro photo app for Mac users wanting more photo editing capabilities than iPhoto allows there is Aperture) — iPhoto is also bundled with Mac OS just as Microsoft has decided to bundle Windows Photo Gallery with Vista and would prefer iPhoto or Picasa to Windows Photo Gallery any day.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s