Tags: Advertising, Google, Google Earth
NASA vs Google
October 28th, 2004, by Rich.

Google’s purchase of Keyhole (announced yesterday) is, I think, the most significant thing they’ve done of late. Google desktop, gmail, groups, news, blogger, froogle are all sidelines, they are mere content providers compared to this.
Keyhole make a product called EarthViewer, which is one of the coolest applications I’ve ever seen - it makes extensive use of the high end graphics cards found in PC’s to map satellite images onto a virtual Earth, adding topographical information into the bargain and then overlaying information about roads, rivers, gas stations, ad infinitum.
Google’s aquisition puts it in a position where it can provide geographically attuned search results - imagine, for example, that you wish to see, at a glance, how many people in the USA have a weblog that mentions “I voted for Kerry“. Google now has the potential to provide such information overlayed directly onto the USA as seen from several kilometers above.
Google is currently rich from the proceeds of it’s IPO, so it is now in a position where it can make strategic purchases the like of which it could only dream of before. With Keyhole, Google has bought itself into a position where it could introduce a completely new way of presenting and interpreting searches results - the combined data from all Google’s other ventures now has a serious and highly attractive presentation engine that could put Google months, if not years ahead of it’s rivals.
Earlier I called Keyhole “one of the coolest applications I’ve ever seen” for good reason - it has competition (which emerged only a few weeks ago) in the form of a NASA led project which is now hosted on sourceforge, namely Worldwind.
Aside from being several years of development behind Earthviewer, Worldwind’s greatest advantage (that it is open source, and free) is also it’s greatest downfall. Interest in Worldwind has been so great that the servers which provide the satellite images from NASA have been down due to overloading. Nasa (and others) are working to remedy this at present, however, with Google’s legendary server farms this is a problem which is unlikely to befall the great search-monster.
Google have immediately slashed the price of the end user version of EarthViewer, and I will not be surprised if it lowers this still further (to zero) once full integration with it’s other services offers significant economies of scale, and advertising opportunities hitherto unimagined.
Virtual billboards here we come.
In the mean time, developers are of course invited to get involved on sourceforge and help develop Worldwind.


May 2nd, 2005 at 4:35 am
I did a recent comparison of KeyholeLT vs. WorldWind and put the comparison on my blog on Saturday. Somehow, TheBeanSprout, who is a diehard WorldWind fan found my blog, even though I had just started it with my comparison blog, and he tried to blast my comparison. I came to similar conclusions as you did.
May 24th, 2005 at 11:57 am
August 5th, 2005 at 6:13 am
Actually, World Wind is more responsive but you may experience slowness due to the slow image servers they have.
World-Wind has a much higher resolution elevation model mesh with as result a more realistic view.
World-Wind also does a far better job rendering high resolution 3D images when you are not looking straight. Google Maps looks fuzzy around the edges with only the center in focus. This makes the 3D landscapes very unatractive.
Google Maps though is much, much faster loading bitmaps (And smarter about which tiles to load first). Google maps is also better at scrolling in 3D view where World Wind starts jittering the view.
I love the ability to overlay and adjust images from a local or internet source in google Earth. You can do this in World Wind but you have to edit some horrible XML files to do that.
But, Google Earth makes a mess of highres JPG images and renders them at a very poor quality Making the effort to add ortho photo’s a waste of time.
The KeyHole integration of places in Google Maps is a stroke of genious.
Google Earth is a nicer “Home” application that is easy to use but World wind has a far better 3D engine and the potential to be much, much better than Google Earth. It is a pitty that World Wind doesn’t have the resources and servers that Google Earth has.
If only the two could work together.
August 28th, 2005 at 7:54 pm
Google earth is quicker, smoother, easier to use and has much higher quality images than
NASA’s World wind. I think we would get to Mars a lot sooner if we gave the space program
to Google!
August 29th, 2006 at 9:35 pm
I would like too know if there is any real time satellite for civilian use if so how can I go about it . Thank you.
Robert