<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Apple and the Quest for the Perfect Gadget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/</link>
	<description>nice of you to drop by.  tea?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/#comment-205073</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boakes.org/?p=680#comment-205073</guid>
		<description>A Gadget To Consider...
While this particular device may not fulfil all of your "Perfect Gadget" requirements - perhaps there's a chance you could design a "jacket" that might cover some of the things you're looking for!
Have a look at http://www.modumobile.com/ for a potential vision of the future!
But perhaps one should consider the definition of the perfect gadget? I mean, as a woman, surely the "swiss army knife" of electrical gadgets should include such fripperies as a flick out mirror and (much like the aforementioned knife) pull out tweezers and nail buffer? Perfection is relative - so until they develop a (handbag friendly) laptop with plug in pda that's small enough to fit in the tiniest of pocketbooks whilst concealing a full arsenal of woman friendly devices (including those tweezers), from my perspective, perfection will never be achieved ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Gadget To Consider&#8230;<br />
While this particular device may not fulfil all of your &#8220;Perfect Gadget&#8221; requirements - perhaps there&#8217;s a chance you could design a &#8220;jacket&#8221; that might cover some of the things you&#8217;re looking for!<br />
Have a look at <a href="http://www.modumobile.com/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.modumobile.com');">http://www.modumobile.com/</a> for a potential vision of the future!<br />
But perhaps one should consider the definition of the perfect gadget? I mean, as a woman, surely the &#8220;swiss army knife&#8221; of electrical gadgets should include such fripperies as a flick out mirror and (much like the aforementioned knife) pull out tweezers and nail buffer? Perfection is relative - so until they develop a (handbag friendly) laptop with plug in pda that&#8217;s small enough to fit in the tiniest of pocketbooks whilst concealing a full arsenal of woman friendly devices (including those tweezers), from my perspective, perfection will never be achieved ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris bristow</title>
		<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/#comment-198570</link>
		<dc:creator>chris bristow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boakes.org/?p=680#comment-198570</guid>
		<description>I purchased an iBook back in 2004 because I wanted a laptop which ran Unix with a decent UI.  And it's utterly brilliant, even four years on.  What Apple does well is that it takes an idea and makes it work - but the underlying tech isn't bleeding-edge, it's mature.  Companies who try and push new tech onto the market often end up with poor products because they're immature.  This makes Apple foremost a great &lt;i&gt;engineering&lt;/i&gt; company - and innovation happens naturally on top of that.  Apple don't make "-and-the-kitchen-sink" products - they ensure the features they provide are useful and work well instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased an iBook back in 2004 because I wanted a laptop which ran Unix with a decent UI.  And it&#8217;s utterly brilliant, even four years on.  What Apple does well is that it takes an idea and makes it work - but the underlying tech isn&#8217;t bleeding-edge, it&#8217;s mature.  Companies who try and push new tech onto the market often end up with poor products because they&#8217;re immature.  This makes Apple foremost a great <i>engineering</i> company - and innovation happens naturally on top of that.  Apple don&#8217;t make &#8220;-and-the-kitchen-sink&#8221; products - they ensure the features they provide are useful and work well instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wise Old Owl</title>
		<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/#comment-194922</link>
		<dc:creator>Wise Old Owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boakes.org/?p=680#comment-194922</guid>
		<description>The 'Perfect gadget' was invented aeons ago.  It was called 'Mother'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;Perfect gadget&#8217; was invented aeons ago.  It was called &#8216;Mother&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Samuel</title>
		<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/#comment-194769</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boakes.org/?p=680#comment-194769</guid>
		<description>Can I add another point ?

- Accessibility.

It must have a reconfigurable tactile interface, both for visually impaired (think dynamic Braille) and to guide people who don't want to be watching what they're doing (touch typing).

Accessibility also for those who desire a simpler interface.  In fact an interface with a few settings like "simple", "medium", "complex", "geek" and "kernel hacker".

Something like the recent Japanese concept of marketing phones with &lt;a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2004/10/005622.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;interfaces designed for the elderly&lt;/a&gt;, maybe ?

cheers!
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I add another point ?</p>
<p>- Accessibility.</p>
<p>It must have a reconfigurable tactile interface, both for visually impaired (think dynamic Braille) and to guide people who don&#8217;t want to be watching what they&#8217;re doing (touch typing).</p>
<p>Accessibility also for those who desire a simpler interface.  In fact an interface with a few settings like &#8220;simple&#8221;, &#8220;medium&#8221;, &#8220;complex&#8221;, &#8220;geek&#8221; and &#8220;kernel hacker&#8221;.</p>
<p>Something like the recent Japanese concept of marketing phones with <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2004/10/005622.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.textually.org');">interfaces designed for the elderly</a>, maybe ?</p>
<p>cheers!<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
