<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Towards the Perfect Gadget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/</link>
	<description>A place for words and data that I publish (for the benefit of persons unknown).</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/comment-page-1/#comment-5552</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boakes.org/?p=680#comment-5552</guid>
		<description>As a woman, surely the &quot;swiss army knife&quot; of electrical gadgets should include such fripperies as a flick out mirror and (much like the aforementioned knife) pull out tweezers and nail buffer? Perfection is relative - so until they develop a (handbag friendly) laptop with plug in pda that&#039;s small enough to fit in the tiniest of pocketbooks whilst concealing a full arsenal of woman friendly devices (including those tweezers), from my perspective, perfection will never be achieved ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a woman, surely the &#8220;swiss army knife&#8221; of electrical gadgets should include such fripperies as a flick out mirror and (much like the aforementioned knife) pull out tweezers and nail buffer? Perfection is relative &#8211; so until they develop a (handbag friendly) laptop with plug in pda that&#8217;s small enough to fit in the tiniest of pocketbooks whilst concealing a full arsenal of woman friendly devices (including those tweezers), from my perspective, perfection will never be achieved ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris bristow</title>
		<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/comment-page-1/#comment-5551</link>
		<dc:creator>chris bristow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boakes.org/?p=680#comment-5551</guid>
		<description>I purchased an iBook back in 2004 because I wanted a laptop which ran Unix with a decent UI.  And it&#039;s utterly brilliant, even four years on.  What Apple does well is that it takes an idea and makes it work - but the underlying tech isn&#039;t bleeding-edge, it&#039;s mature.  Companies who try and push new tech onto the market often end up with poor products because they&#039;re immature.  This makes Apple foremost a great &lt;i&gt;engineering&lt;/i&gt; company - and innovation happens naturally on top of that.  Apple don&#039;t make &quot;-and-the-kitchen-sink&quot; products - they ensure the features they provide are useful and work well instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased an iBook back in 2004 because I wanted a laptop which ran Unix with a decent UI.  And it&#8217;s utterly brilliant, even four years on.  What Apple does well is that it takes an idea and makes it work &#8211; but the underlying tech isn&#8217;t bleeding-edge, it&#8217;s mature.  Companies who try and push new tech onto the market often end up with poor products because they&#8217;re immature.  This makes Apple foremost a great <i>engineering</i> company &#8211; and innovation happens naturally on top of that.  Apple don&#8217;t make &#8220;-and-the-kitchen-sink&#8221; products &#8211; they ensure the features they provide are useful and work well instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Samuel</title>
		<link>http://boakes.org/perfectgadget/comment-page-1/#comment-5549</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boakes.org/?p=680#comment-5549</guid>
		<description>Can I add another point ?

- Accessibility.

It must have a reconfigurable tactile interface, both for visually impaired (think dynamic Braille) and to guide people who don&#039;t want to be watching what they&#039;re doing (touch typing).

Accessibility also for those who desire a simpler interface.  In fact an interface with a few settings like &quot;simple&quot;, &quot;medium&quot;, &quot;complex&quot;, &quot;geek&quot; and &quot;kernel hacker&quot;.

Something like the recent Japanese concept of marketing phones with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2004/10/005622.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interfaces designed for the elderly&lt;/a&gt;, maybe ?

cheers!
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I add another point ?</p>
<p>- Accessibility.</p>
<p>It must have a reconfigurable tactile interface, both for visually impaired (think dynamic Braille) and to guide people who don&#8217;t want to be watching what they&#8217;re doing (touch typing).</p>
<p>Accessibility also for those who desire a simpler interface.  In fact an interface with a few settings like &#8220;simple&#8221;, &#8220;medium&#8221;, &#8220;complex&#8221;, &#8220;geek&#8221; and &#8220;kernel hacker&#8221;.</p>
<p>Something like the recent Japanese concept of marketing phones with <a href="http://www.textually.org/textually/archives/2004/10/005622.htm" rel="nofollow">interfaces designed for the elderly</a>, maybe ?</p>
<p>cheers!<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

