Comments on: Spam Indirection http://boakes.org/spam-indirection/ nice of you to drop by. tea? Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:09:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage hourly 1 By: Rich http://boakes.org/spam-indirection/#comment-16002 Rich Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:17:21 +0000 http://boakes.org/?p=455#comment-16002 Kitty, sorry but I have no idea what your point is, perhaps you had some markup that got stripped out before it reached the moderation stage. Can you clarify please. It looks like you're suggesting that SORBS is bad, and attempting to bolster your argument through the use of an irrelevant religious simile. ...and what on earth does this have to do with Steve Irwin? Kitty, sorry but I have no idea what your point is, perhaps you had some markup that got stripped out before it reached the moderation stage. Can you clarify please.

It looks like you’re suggesting that SORBS is bad, and attempting to bolster your argument through the use of an irrelevant religious simile.

…and what on earth does this have to do with Steve Irwin?

]]> By: kitty http://boakes.org/spam-indirection/#comment-15990 kitty Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:44:43 +0000 http://boakes.org/?p=455#comment-15990 it seems that mat sullivan is running his own 'spam' site ...have you had a look at the site .. imho .. any unelected user that purports to police the internet ... afterall any dial up connection must be bad ... does this sound like 'any muslim must be bad' ... cos they killed the wtc and he is just another steve irwin ... except he has no crocs it seems that mat sullivan is running his own ’spam’ site …have you had a look at the site .. imho .. any unelected user that purports to police the internet … afterall any dial up connection must be bad … does this sound like ‘any muslim must be bad’ … cos they killed the wtc

and he is just another steve irwin … except he has no crocs

]]> By: Chris Samuel http://boakes.org/spam-indirection/#comment-3913 Chris Samuel Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:44:49 +0000 http://boakes.org/?p=455#comment-3913 I've had a different variation, a spam which instead of the spammers website has a link to a legit sites redirect script which doesn't check where it's being sent to, and it's being told to send you to the spammers site. Basically its to get around things like the current implementation of SURBL blacklist checking in SpamAssassin.. I’ve had a different variation, a spam which instead of the spammers website has a link to a legit sites redirect script which doesn’t check where it’s being sent to, and it’s being told to send you to the spammers site.

Basically its to get around things like the current implementation of SURBL blacklist checking in SpamAssassin..

]]>