Tags: Politics, Religion, Silly
This isn’t Kansas anymore Toto
November 9th, 2005, by Rich.
Warning: apache_lookup_uri() [function.apache-lookup-uri]: Unable to include '/pics/2005/kansas/dorothy' - error finding URI in /home/www/boakes.org/htdocs/mods/plugins/boakes-depicticon.php on line 65
I cannot let the landmark events in Kansas go by without a mention. The Kansas Board of Education have introduced Intelligent Design into the curriculum.
The fact that supporters of intelligent design are casting doubt on evolutionary theory is fine, it’s an important part of scientific method that our theoretical models are challenged; however, I must register my strong disapproval that the board has deemed it necessary to redefine “Science” in order to shoehorn justify their decision.
the board rewrote the definition of science, so that it is no longer limited to the search for natural explanations of phenomena.
Does anyone know where the new definition lives? I ask because it must be the same place that stores the new definitions for “bungling, botch, floundering, idiot, ignoramus, incompetent, inadequate, incapable, inept, negligent, unqualified, unobservant” and the phrase “Board of Education”.
The issue was discussed on BBC Radio 4 yesterday [requires Real Player].
Emeritus Professor Derek Denton (Biology, Univ. of Melbourne) presents a wonderful biological counter argument to the theory of intelligent design, suggesting that if it’s designed, then it wasn’t particularly intelligent.
Perhaps the Flying Spaghetti Monster will be pleased that His design is being critiqued in order that He may create a patch for Humanity 2.0 when He arrives on Earth.


November 10th, 2005 at 12:01 am
Looks like the voters in Dover liked this whole thing even less, they decided not to re-elect any of the 8 board members who were up for election. Now that’s real intelligent design.. :-)
Unfortunately now Kansas has gone and decreed that ID must be taught in science lessons..
Chris
February 14th, 2007 at 9:17 am
Kansas standards again pro-evolution; future shifts possible
As Mr. Hanna describes in the article, this boils down to a political tit-for-tat battle between Christian bible-belt God-fearing republicans and more open-minded democrats, who may or may not be religious, and don’t appear to let that affect their governance.